Heat Pumps vs. Furnaces
Your Glens Falls Home Heating Guide: Pros and Cons of Heat Pumps vs. Furnaces
Winter in the foothills of the Adirondacks is serious business. Bone-chilling winds and temperatures that plunge well below freezing demand a reliable heating system. But which is the right choice for your Glens Falls home—a furnace or a heat pump?
The answer isn’t always straightforward. Both systems have their strengths and weaknesses, and the ideal choice depends on your budget and environmental priorities. Keep reading to learn about the intricacies of each so you can make an informed decision.
Heat Pumps vs. Furnaces
| Feature | Heat Pump | Furnace |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Efficiency | Very high. Can save you 30-60% on heating costs compared to furnaces. | Lower. Older models can be quite inefficient. |
| Environmental Impact | Much lower. Uses electricity and significantly reduces greenhouse gas emissions. | Higher. Burns fossil fuels, contributing to air pollution. |
| Heating Performance | Excellent in moderate climates. Can struggle in extreme cold (-10°F or lower). | Consistent heating even in the coldest weather. |
| Cooling Ability | Most heat pumps also cool your home, eliminating the need for a separate air conditioner. | No cooling function. |
| Life Span | 15-20 years | 15-25 years |
| Up-Front Cost | Higher than furnaces. However, there are tax credits and rebates available. | Lower initial investment. |
| Maintenance | Requires annual tune-ups and occasional repairs. | Requires annual tune-ups and occasional repairs. |
| Noise Level | Operates quietly. | Can be noisy, especially older models. |
Let Simons Heating & Cooling Help You Make the Right Choice